Intelligence & National Security

1.6k papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Intelligence & National Security in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Intelligence & National Security usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (423 papers) and History (121 papers) specifically the topics of Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1.0k papers), Military History and Strategy (214 papers) and Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intelligence & National Security are Stephen Marrin, Loch K. Johnson, Michael Warner, Christopher Andrew, Peter Gill, Richard Aldrich, John Ferris, Mark Phythian, Michael I. Handel and Len Scott.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Intelligence & National Security

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Intelligence & National Security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intelligence & National Security.

Countries where authors publish in Intelligence & National Security

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intelligence & National Security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intelligence & National Security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intelligence & National Security more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025