Cognitive Processing

1.1k papers and 17.3k indexed citations

About

The 1.1k papers published in Cognitive Processing in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Processing usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (574 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (325 papers) and Social Psychology (234 papers) specifically the topics of Spatial Cognition and Navigation (154 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (131 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Processing are Marcelo B. Antunes, Grażyna Biała, Karl Friston, James M. Kilner, Chris Frith, Nicholas P. Holmes, Charles Spence, Joachim Funke, Martin H. Fischer and Pamela Lyon.

In The Last Decade

Cognitive Processing

944 papers receiving 16.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Processing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Processing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Processing.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Processing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Processing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Processing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Processing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026