Replace Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment with:
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentUnited States
Child and Adolescent Mental HealthUnited Kingdom
New Directions for Child and Adolescent DevelopmentUnited States
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneCanada
InfancyUnited States
PsicothemaSpain
School Psychology QuarterlyUnited States
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportementCanada
European Journal of Developmental PsychologyUnited States
The Spanish Journal of PsychologySpain
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development · 1×
×1.011.2kCP
×1.310.6kEDUCA
×1.29.4kDEP
×1.27.4kSP
×0.84.1kCN
Citations per year, relative to Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Infant and Child Development
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Infant and Child Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Infant and Child Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infant and Child Development more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Infant and Child Development
This network shows the impact of papers published in Infant and Child Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Infant and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.