This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dialog. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dialog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dialog more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Dialog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dialog.
About Dialog
The 560 papers published in Dialog in the last decades have received a total of 982 indexed citations . Papers published in Dialog usually cover Religious studies (177 papers), Philosophy (118 papers), History (77 papers), Sociology and Political Science (264 papers) and Classics (12 papers) specifically the topics of Christian Theology and Mission (97 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (95 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (80 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (74 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (66 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (66 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (56 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dialog are Niels Henrik Gregersen, Ernest Simmons, Panu Pihkala, Philip Hefner, Ted Peters, Stephen Ellingson, Marcia J. Bunge, Rosemary Radford Ruether, Philip Clayton and David Martin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.