Journal of Nursing Measurement

817 papers and 10.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 817 papers published in Journal of Nursing Measurement in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Nursing Measurement usually cover General Health Professions (307 papers), Clinical Psychology (161 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (136 papers) specifically the topics of Health and Wellbeing Research (77 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (58 papers) and Nursing education and management (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Nursing Measurement are Gail Wagnild, Barbara Resnick, Jaclene A. Zauszniewski, Mary E. Müller, Kathryn G. Sapnas, Richard A. Zeller, Darlene Weis, Mary Jane Schank, Eun Shim Nahm and Kathy C. Richards.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Nursing Measurement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Nursing Measurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Nursing Measurement.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Nursing Measurement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Nursing Measurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Nursing Measurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Nursing Measurement more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025