Engineering Management

401 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 401 papers published in Engineering Management in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Engineering Management usually cover Management Information Systems (30 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (19 papers) and Strategy and Management (16 papers) specifically the topics of Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (13 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (12 papers) and Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Engineering Management are Richard Stevens, D.R. Towill, R. H. Hollier, Hefin Rowlands, J. Parnaby, Mark Dodgson, Kazem Chaharbaghi, Derek K. Hitchins, John Boardman and Danny Quah.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Engineering Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Engineering Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Engineering Management.

Countries where authors publish in Engineering Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Engineering Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Engineering Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engineering Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025