International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

2.9k citations
467 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

385 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

International Journal of Technology Policy and Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Strategy and Management 957
  • Business and International Management 107
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 360
  • Management Information Systems 358
  • Marketing 298
Replace Frontiers of Business Research in China with:
Frontiers of Business Research in China China
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance United Kingdom
Journal of Management History United States
Journal of East European Management Studies Slovenia
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business United States
International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management France
Verslas teorija ir praktika Lithuania
International Journal of Business Performance Management United Kingdom
International Journal of Services Technology and Management China
Business Economics United States
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management relative to Frontiers of Business Research in China China Frontiers of Business Research in China's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Frontiers of Business Research in China · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Technology Policy and Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management.

About International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

The 467 papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management usually cover Business and International Management (20 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (62 papers), Strategy and Management (125 papers), Management Information Systems (52 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (122 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (57 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (32 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (28 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (27 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (25 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (23 papers), Quality and Supply Management (21 papers) and University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management are Mario Coccia, Inderpreet Singh Ahuja, Warren E. Walker, Vincent Marchau, Jan Kwakkel, Chung-Kuang Hou, Joop Koppenjan, John Groenewegen, Pieter W. G. Bots and C. Els van Daalen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact