Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dodgson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dodgson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dodgson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dodgson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dodgson. The network helps show where Mark Dodgson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Dodgson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Dodgson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Dodgson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Dodgson. Mark Dodgson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davies, Andrew, Mark Dodgson, David Gann, & Samuel C. MacAulay. (2017). Five Rules for Managing Large, Complex Projects. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 59(1). 72–78.33 indexed citations
2.
Davies, Andrew, Mark Dodgson, & David Gann. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities in Complex Projects: The Case of London Heathrow Terminal 5. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Ozaki, Ritsuko, et al.. (2013). The Negotiated Consumption of Sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Gann, David, Ammon Salter, Mark Dodgson, & Nelson Phillips. (2012). Inside the world of the project baron. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 53(3). 63–71.5 indexed citations
6.
Ozaki, Ritsuko, et al.. (2012). The Coproduction of ‘Sustainability’: Negotiated Practices and the Prius. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Dodgson, Mark, Alan Hughes, John Foster, & J. Stanley Metcalfe. (2009). Systems Thinking, Market Failure, and the Development of Innovation Policy: The Case of Australia. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
10.
Dodgson, Mark, John A. Mathews, Tim Kastelle, & Mei‐Chih Hu. (2008). The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
11.
Gann, David & Mark Dodgson. (2008). Innovate with vision. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 36(10). 45–49.1 indexed citations
Dodgson, Mark, David Gann, & Ammon Salter. (2007). ‘In Case of Fire, Please Use the Elevator’: Simulation Technology and Organization in Fire Engineering. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Dodgson, Mark, Mari Sako, & Jonathan Sapsed. (1995). Achieving Complementarities of Size Advantages in New Product Development - the Case of Multimedia in Japan. International Journal of Technology Management. 183–205.1 indexed citations
18.
Dodgson, Mark & Roy Rothwell. (1991). External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. SSRN Electronic Journal.286 indexed citations
19.
Dodgson, Mark & Ian Miles. (1990). Technology policy in Europe. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 5(3). 62–66.1 indexed citations
20.
Dodgson, Mark. (1989). Technology strategy and the firm : management and public policy. Longman eBooks.45 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.