Replace Archive for History of Exact Sciences with:
Archive for History of Exact SciencesUnited States
The Mathematical IntelligencerUnited States
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AUnited States
Annals of ScienceUnited Kingdom
dialecticaUnited States
Journal of Philosophical LogicUnited States
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern PhysicsUnited States
Foundations of ScienceUnited States
American ScientistUnited States
Notre Dame Journal of Formal LogicUnited States
Archive for History of Exact SciencesUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Historia Mathematica
Historia Mathematica · 1×
×1.12.4kTCS
×1.52.3kHPS
×1.2921GT
×1.1823ANTHR
×2.51.4kAA
Citations per year, relative to Historia Mathematica
Historia Mathematica · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries where authors publish in Historia Mathematica
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historia Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historia Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historia Mathematica more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Historia Mathematica
This network shows the impact of papers published in Historia Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historia Mathematica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.