Current Opinion in Cardiology

2.9k papers and 46.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Current Opinion in Cardiology in the last decades have received a total of 46.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Cardiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.9k papers), Surgery (984 papers) and Epidemiology (424 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (408 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (329 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (302 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Cardiology are Shannon S. D. Bredin, Darren E. R. Warburton, Charles Antzelevitch, Marek Malík, Karl T. Weber, Ali J. Marian, Anthony S. Wierzbicki, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Jawahar L. Mehta and Bruce D. Gelb.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Cardiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Cardiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Cardiology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Cardiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Cardiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Cardiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Cardiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025