Health Professions Education

221 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 221 papers published in Health Professions Education in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Professions Education usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (118 papers), General Health Professions (67 papers) and Education (57 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (108 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (34 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Professions Education are Elaine H. J. Yew, Karen Goh, Samy A. Azer, Cézar Augusto Casotti, Ícaro José Santos Ribeiro, Ivna Vidal Freire, Eduardo Nagib Boery, Rafael Pereira, Bruno Gonçalves de Oliveira and Henk G. Schmidt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Professions Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Professions Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Professions Education.

Countries where authors publish in Health Professions Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Professions Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Professions Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Professions Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025