Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

363 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports usually cover Oncology (285 papers), Surgery (95 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (95 papers) specifically the topics of Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (148 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (91 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports are Vincent W. Yang, Benjamin I. Leach, Lukas E. Dow, Emma M. Schatoff, John M. Carethers, Łukasz Durko, Stephen Safe, Ewa Małecka‐Panas, Sandeep Sreevalsan and Lin Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Colorectal Cancer Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Colorectal Cancer Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025