Biosemiotics

491 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 491 papers published in Biosemiotics in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Biosemiotics usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (199 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (117 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (107 papers) specifically the topics of Origins and Evolution of Life (196 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (108 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biosemiotics are Marcello Barbieri, Almo Farina, Kalevi Kull, Jérôme Sueur, Morten Tønnessen, Timo Maran, Jesper Hoffmeyer, Karel Kleisner, Alexei A. Sharov and Mark Reybrouck.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biosemiotics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biosemiotics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biosemiotics.

Countries where authors publish in Biosemiotics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biosemiotics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biosemiotics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biosemiotics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025