Global Ecology and Biogeography

2.6k papers and 173.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Global Ecology and Biogeography in the last decades have received a total of 173.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Ecology and Biogeography usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.5k papers), Ecology (1.2k papers) and Ecological Modeling (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.3k papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1.1k papers) and Plant and animal studies (556 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Ecology and Biogeography are Andrés Baselga, Terence P. Dawson, Richard G. Pearson, Alberto Jiménez‐Valverde, Mark V. Lomolino, Miguel B. Araújo, Pierre Legendre, Jorge M. Lobo, Christy M. McCain and Shai Meiri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Ecology and Biogeography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Ecology and Biogeography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Ecology and Biogeography.

Countries where authors publish in Global Ecology and Biogeography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Ecology and Biogeography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Ecology and Biogeography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Ecology and Biogeography more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025