JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

2.0k papers and 105.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging in the last decades have received a total of 105.9k indexed citations. Papers published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.2k papers) and Surgery (615 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1.1k papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (606 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (459 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging are Thomas H. Marwick, Partho P. Sengupta, Christopher M. Kramer, K. Lance Gould, Michael Salerno, Daniel S. Berman, Gary S. Mintz, James K. Min, Rebecca T. Hahn and Matthew J. Budoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

Countries where authors publish in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JACC. Cardiovascular imaging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025