Implementation Science

2.1k papers and 141.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Implementation Science in the last decades have received a total of 141.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Implementation Science usually cover General Health Professions (1.6k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (430 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (374 papers) specifically the topics of Health Policy Implementation Science (1.2k papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (498 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (318 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Implementation Science are Susan Michie, Heather Colquhoun, Kelly K. O’Brien, Danielle Levac, Laura J. Damschroder, Per Nilsén, Robert West, Maartje M. van Stralen, Julie C. Lowery and Bryan J. Weiner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Implementation Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Implementation Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Implementation Science.

Countries where authors publish in Implementation Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Implementation Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Implementation Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Implementation Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025