Fungal Diversity

571 papers and 34.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 571 papers published in Fungal Diversity in the last decades have received a total of 34.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Fungal Diversity usually cover Plant Science (486 papers), Cell Biology (443 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (230 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (443 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (419 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fungal Diversity are Kevin D. Hyde, Yu‐Cheng Dai, Ali H. Bahkali, Alan J. L. Phillips, P.W. Crous, Ekachai Chukeatirote, Eric H. C. McKenzie, Derek Peršoh, Peter Proksch and Abdessamad Debbab.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fungal Diversity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fungal Diversity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fungal Diversity.

Countries where authors publish in Fungal Diversity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fungal Diversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fungal Diversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fungal Diversity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025