Natural Toxins

388 papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 388 papers published in Natural Toxins in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Toxins usually cover Plant Science (148 papers), Molecular Biology (142 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (118 papers) specifically the topics of Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (112 papers), Marine Toxins and Detection Methods (103 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Toxins are Takeshi Yasumoto, Petr Karlovský, Gregory J. Doucette, Masayuki Satake, Adrian Leuchtmann, Walter F. O. Marasas, D. B. Prelusky, H. L. Trenholm, Ronald D. Plattner and Wayne W. Carmichael.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Toxins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Toxins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Toxins.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Toxins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Toxins. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Toxins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Toxins more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025