Bill Shipley
Impact in
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.1%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 75
- Forest ecology and management 7
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 22
- Co-authors
- Paul A. KeddyÉric GarnierDenis VileDriss MezianeD. R. CaustonRoderick HuntAndrew P. AskewJens Kattge
- Journals
- Ecology (17 papers)Functional Ecology (14 papers)Annals of Botany (14 papers)Oikos (9 papers)Journal of Vegetation Science (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Bill Shipley
131 papers receiving 10.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.4k
- Ecological Modeling 1.2k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.5k
- Soil Science 1.4k
- Ecology 3.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Bill Shipley
This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Shipley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Shipley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Shipley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Shipley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Shipley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Shipley. The network helps show where Bill Shipley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bill Shipley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 84 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 13 | The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using a d‐separation test Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 442 |
| 14 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 88 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 145 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 155 |
About Bill Shipley
Bill Shipley is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 131 papers that have together received 10.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (75 papers), Plant and animal studies (42 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (22 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (18 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (18 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (7 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (7 papers) and Forest ecology and management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.5k citations), Soil Science (1.4k citations) and Ecology (3.2k citations). Bill Shipley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Keddy, Éric Garnier, Denis Vile, Driss Meziane, D. R. Causton, Roderick Hunt, Andrew P. Askew, Jens Kattge, Dwayne R. J. Moore and Peter Manning. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Functional Ecology, Annals of Botany, Oikos and Journal of Vegetation Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.