This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fruits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fruits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fruits more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fruits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fruits.
About Fruits
The 1.8k papers published in Fruits in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Fruits usually cover Horticulture (65 papers), Forestry (232 papers), Plant Science (1.3k papers), Biochemistry (102 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (317 papers) specifically the topics of Banana Cultivation and Research (537 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (343 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (229 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (201 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (159 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (157 papers), Pineapple and bromelain studies (145 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fruits are Bernard Aubert, Manuel Dornier, Éric Fouré, Jacky Ganry, Jean‐François Vayssières, Fabrice Eric Vaillant, R. H. Stover, Fabrice Le Bellec, Hüsnü Demirsoy and Max Reynes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.