Food and Bioprocess Technology

3.7k papers and 113.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.7k papers published in Food and Bioprocess Technology in the last decades have received a total of 113.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Food and Bioprocess Technology usually cover Food Science (2.0k papers), Plant Science (975 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (691 papers) specifically the topics of Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (584 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (554 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (530 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food and Bioprocess Technology are Umezuruike Linus Opara, Da‐Wen Sun, Digvir S. Jayas, J. A. Teixeira, Pankaj B. Pathare, Min Zhang, Solange I. Mussatto, Valérie Orsat, Tatiana Koutchma and Yong He.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food and Bioprocess Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food and Bioprocess Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food and Bioprocess Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Food and Bioprocess Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food and Bioprocess Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food and Bioprocess Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food and Bioprocess Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025