Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases

2.1k papers and 40.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases in the last decades have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases usually cover Parasitology (1.9k papers), Infectious Diseases (1.5k papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (857 papers) specifically the topics of Vector-borne infectious diseases (1.9k papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (1.4k papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (781 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases are Marcelo B. Labruna, Jochen Süß, Thiago Fernandes Martins, Santiago Nava, Agustín Estrada‐Peña, Jeremy Gray, José de la Fuente, Didier Raoult, Sarah Randolph and Lars Eisen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases.

Countries where authors publish in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025