Experimental Physiology

4.5k papers and 114.0k indexed citations

About

The 4.5k papers published in Experimental Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 114.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Physiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k papers), Physiology (1.2k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (730 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (557 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (526 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Physiology are Helmut Sies, John H. Coote, Denis Noble, Paul J. Fadel, Julian F. R. Paton, Paul T. Schumacker, Robert D. Guzy, Geoffrey Burnstock, Philip N. Ainslie and Lucilla Poston.

In The Last Decade

Experimental Physiology

4.4k papers receiving 110.8k citations

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Physiology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Experimental Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026