Experimental Mathematics

1.0k papers and 11.7k indexed citations

About

The 1.0k papers published in Experimental Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Mathematics usually cover Geometry and Topology (595 papers), Mathematical Physics (432 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (300 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (276 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (195 papers) and Geometric and Algebraic Topology (189 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Mathematics are Kenneth A. Brakke, Konrad Polthier, Ulrich Pinkall, Àngel Jorba, Ryo Kobayashi, John H. Conway, Jonathan M. Borwein, N. J. A. Sloane, R. H. Hardin and Richard E. Crandall.

In The Last Decade

Experimental Mathematics

903 papers receiving 10.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Experimental Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026