Earth Planets and Space

4.2k papers and 71.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Earth Planets and Space in the last decades have received a total of 71.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Earth Planets and Space usually cover Geophysics (2.8k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k papers) and Molecular Biology (859 papers) specifically the topics of earthquake and tectonic studies (1.6k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.1k papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (922 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Earth Planets and Space are Kazushige Obara, Yasuo Ogawa, Nils Olsen, Yuichi Otsuka, H. Lühr, Kenji Satake, Takeshi Sagiya, Shin’ichi Sakai, Akira Hasegawa and Hiroo Kanamori.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Earth Planets and Space

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Earth Planets and Space. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Earth Planets and Space.

Countries where authors publish in Earth Planets and Space

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Earth Planets and Space. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Earth Planets and Space with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earth Planets and Space more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025