CESifo Economic Studies

517 papers and 8.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 517 papers published in CESifo Economic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations. Papers published in CESifo Economic Studies usually cover Economics and Econometrics (329 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (105 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (96 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (120 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (57 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CESifo Economic Studies are Claudio Borio, Eytan Sheshinski, A. B. Atkinson, Paul De Grauwe, Alan Kirman, Jeffrey A. Frankel, Reyer Gerlagh, Marc Quintyn, Bart van Ark and Qiao Liu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in CESifo Economic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CESifo Economic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CESifo Economic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in CESifo Economic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CESifo Economic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CESifo Economic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CESifo Economic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025