Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes
2008438 citationsBart van Ark, Mary O’Mahony et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bart van Ark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart van Ark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart van Ark more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart van Ark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart van Ark. The network helps show where Bart van Ark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bart van Ark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bart van Ark.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bart van Ark based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bart van Ark. Bart van Ark is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ark, Bart van & Anthony J. Venables. (2020). A Concerted Effort to Tackle the UK Productivity Puzzle. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
2.
Ark, Bart van, et al.. (2017). Recent Trends in Europe's Output and Productivity Growth Performance at the Sector Level, 2002-2015. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.39 indexed citations
3.
Ark, Bart van. (2016). The Productivity Paradox of the New Digital Economy. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 31(31). 3–18.96 indexed citations
4.
Timmer, Marcel P., Robert Inklaar, Mary O’Mahony, & Bart van Ark. (2011). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.45 indexed citations
5.
Inklaar, Robert, Marcel P. Timmer, & Bart van Ark. (2008). Data for Productivity Measurement in Market Services: An International Comparison. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16. 72–81.11 indexed citations
6.
Timmer, Marcel P., Mary O’Mahony, & Bart van Ark. (2007). EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.117 indexed citations
7.
Ark, Bart van. (2005). In Search of the Silver Bullet for Productivity Growth: A Review Article of "The Power of Productivity and Transforming the European Economy". SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
8.
Ark, Bart van, et al.. (2005). Does Information and Communication Technology Drive Eu-Us Productivity Growth Differentials?. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Ark, Bart van, Robert Inklaar, & Robert H. McGuckin. (2003). The Contribution of ICT-Producing and ICT-Using Industries to Productivity Growth: A Comparison of Canada, Europe and the United States. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.39 indexed citations
10.
Timmer, Marcel P., et al.. (2003). IT in the European Union: Driving Productivity Divergence?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.86 indexed citations
11.
O’Mahony, Mary & Bart van Ark. (2003). EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process?. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities eBooks.201 indexed citations
12.
Ark, Bart van, Marcel P. Timmer, & Robert Inklaar. (2002). The Canada-U.S. manufacturing productivity gap revisited: new ICOP results. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.20 indexed citations
13.
Ark, Bart van. (2002). ICT investments and growth accounts for the European Union. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.37 indexed citations
14.
Ark, Bart van & Marcel P. Timmer. (2001). The ICOP Manufacturing Database: International Comparisons of Productivity Levels. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 44–51.9 indexed citations
15.
Ark, Bart van & Lorenzo Serrano Martínez. (2001). Productividad del sector manufacturas en España: medio siglo de crecimiento y convergencia. Revista de historia industrial. 77–101.2 indexed citations
16.
Ark, Bart van. (2001). Britain's productivity performance 1950-1996: An international perspective. The Economic Journal. 111(472).1 indexed citations
17.
Ark, Bart van. (1999). Economic growth and labour productivity in Europe : half a century of east-west comparisons. Kagoshima Kenritsu Tanki Daigaku Chiiki Kenkyūjo kenkyū nenpō.25 indexed citations
18.
Ark, Bart van. (1996). Issues in Measurement and International Comparison of Productivity - An Overview. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.31 indexed citations
19.
Beintema, Nienke M. & Bart van Ark. (1993). Comparative Productivity in East and West German Manufacturing before Reunification. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.35 indexed citations
20.
Szirmai, Adam, Bart van Ark, & Dirk Pilat. (1993). Explaining Economic Growth. Essays in Honour of Angus Maddison. Elsevier eBooks.41 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.