Countries where authors publish in Mental Health Clinician
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mental Health Clinician. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mental Health Clinician with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mental Health Clinician more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Mental Health Clinician
This network shows the impact of papers published in Mental Health Clinician. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mental Health Clinician.
About Mental Health Clinician
The 545 papers published in Mental Health Clinician in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Mental Health Clinician usually cover Geriatrics and Gerontology (102 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (262 papers) and Family Practice (23 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (153 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (102 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (84 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (61 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (47 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (43 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (39 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mental Health Clinician are Markéta Marvanová, Benjamin Malcolm, Kimberly Tallian, Jessica L. Gören, Jack J. Chen, Megan J. Ehret, Kelly C. Lee, Amy VandenBerg, Troy Moore and Marshall E. Cates.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.