Countries where authors publish in Doklady Physics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Doklady Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Doklady Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doklady Physics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Doklady Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Doklady Physics.
About Doklady Physics
The 2.9k papers published in Doklady Physics in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Doklady Physics usually cover General Materials Science (110 papers), Mechanics of Materials (725 papers), Computational Mechanics (536 papers), Applied Mathematics (148 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (351 papers) specifically the topics of Elasticity and Wave Propagation (269 papers), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (223 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (209 papers), Material Properties and Applications (100 papers), Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (89 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (84 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (82 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Doklady Physics are М. В. Шамолин, Н. Ф. Морозов, Yu. D. Chashechkin, F. L. Chernousko, Yu. V. Petrov, А. М. Кривцов, В. А. Бабешко, Victor A. Eremeyev, О. М. Бабешко and S. M. Afonin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.