Diplomatic History

1.4k papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Diplomatic History in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Diplomatic History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (584 papers), Political Science and International Relations (554 papers) and History (261 papers) specifically the topics of Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (171 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (170 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diplomatic History are John Lewis Gaddis, Michael J. Hogan, Nick Cullather, David C. Engerman, Erez Manela, Henry R. Luce, Emily S. Rosenberg, Akira Iriye, Paul A. Kramer and David Ekbladh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Diplomatic History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diplomatic History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diplomatic History.

Countries where authors publish in Diplomatic History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diplomatic History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diplomatic History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diplomatic History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025