Diagnostica

570 papers and 14.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 570 papers published in Diagnostica in the last decades have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Diagnostica usually cover Clinical Psychology (217 papers), Social Psychology (140 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (134 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (120 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (68 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diagnostica are Elmar Brähler, Beatrice Rammstedt, Ralf Schwarzer, Oliver P. John, Martin Hautzinger, Andreas Maercker, Ute Schulz, Henrik Kessler, Birgit Abler and Wolff Schlotz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Diagnostica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diagnostica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diagnostica.

Countries where authors publish in Diagnostica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diagnostica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diagnostica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diagnostica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025