Carbon Balance and Management

364 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 364 papers published in Carbon Balance and Management in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Carbon Balance and Management usually cover Global and Planetary Change (266 papers), Environmental Engineering (128 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (121 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (118 papers), Forest Management and Policy (109 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Carbon Balance and Management are G. A. Alexandrov, Christopher W. Woodall, T. Pearson, Lara T. Murray, Sandra Brown, Ning Zeng, Jason C. Neff, Gregory P. Asner, Gabriel Sidman and Alessandro Baccini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Carbon Balance and Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Carbon Balance and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Carbon Balance and Management.

Countries where authors publish in Carbon Balance and Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Carbon Balance and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Carbon Balance and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbon Balance and Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025