Wolff Schlotz
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Peter J. SchulzDirk H. HellhammerArthur A. StoneDavid I. W. PhillipsStefan WüstUlrike EhlertRobert KumstaUrs M. Nater
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (30 papers)Health, psychology, and well-being (15 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe LancetJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wolff Schlotz
91 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Behavioral Neuroscience 2.3k
- Clinical Psychology 1.9k
- Social Psychology 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 772
Countries citing papers authored by Wolff Schlotz
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolff Schlotz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolff Schlotz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolff Schlotz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolff Schlotz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolff Schlotz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolff Schlotz. The network helps show where Wolff Schlotz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolff Schlotz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolff Schlotz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolff Schlotz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolff Schlotz. Wolff Schlotz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 129 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 72 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | Deprivation-specific psychological patterns: Effects of institutional deprivation by the English and Romanian Adoptee Study Team | 5 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 126 | |
| 16 | 482 | |
| 17 | 119 | |
| 18 | 388 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress | 89 |
About Wolff Schlotz
Wolff Schlotz is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (30 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (15 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (2.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (389 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.9k citations). Wolff Schlotz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Schulz, Dirk H. Hellhammer, Arthur A. Stone, David I. W. Phillips, Stefan Wüst, Ulrike Ehlert, Robert Kumsta, Urs M. Nater, Brigitte M. Kudielka and Edmund Sonuga‐Barke. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.