This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diagnosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diagnosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diagnosis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Diagnosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diagnosis.
About Diagnosis
The 692 papers published in Diagnosis in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Diagnosis usually cover Family Practice (272 papers), Health Informatics (12 papers), Physiology (60 papers), Health Information Management (10 papers) and Infectious Diseases (29 papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (272 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (56 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (14 papers), Radiology practices and education (12 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (12 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (10 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (10 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diagnosis are Giuseppe Lippi, Hardeep Singh, Brandon Michael Henry, David E. Newman‐Toker, Leonard Berlin, Mario Plebani, Mark L. Graber, Steven J. Durning, Laura Zwaan and Pat Croskerry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.