David E. Newman‐Toker
Impact in
- Neurology top 0.01%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
- Family Practice top 0.05%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 41
- Neurology 79
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 77
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 36
- Co-authors
- Yu‐Hsiang HsiehJorge C. KattahJonathan A. EdlowAlexandre BisdorffAli S. Saber TehraniMichael von BrevernDavid Z. WangThomas Lempert
- Journals
- Diagnosis (21 papers)Neurology (13 papers)Academic Emergency Medicine (9 papers)Journal of Vestibular Research (9 papers)BMJ Quality & Safety (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
David E. Newman‐Toker
145 papers receiving 10.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Neurology 7.4k
- Family Practice 1.3k
- Sensory Systems 2.7k
- Ophthalmology 2.2k
- Neurology 2.7k
Countries citing papers authored by David E. Newman‐Toker
This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Newman‐Toker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Newman‐Toker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Newman‐Toker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Newman‐Toker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Newman‐Toker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Newman‐Toker. The network helps show where David E. Newman‐Toker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Newman‐Toker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 91 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 104 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 64 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 184 | |
| 20 | HINTS to Diagnose Stroke in the Acute Vestibular Syndrome Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 704 |
About David E. Newman‐Toker
David E. Newman‐Toker is a scholar working on Family Practice, Neurology, Sensory Systems, Pharmacy and Neurology, having authored 154 papers that have together received 10.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (77 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (41 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (36 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (35 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (20 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (18 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (7.4k citations), Family Practice (1.3k citations), Sensory Systems (2.7k citations), Ophthalmology (2.2k citations) and Neurology (2.7k citations). David E. Newman‐Toker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Yu‐Hsiang Hsieh, Jorge C. Kattah, Jonathan A. Edlow, Alexandre Bisdorff, Ali S. Saber Tehrani, Michael von Brevern, David Z. Wang, Thomas Lempert, David S. Zee and John P. Carey. Their work appears in journals such as Diagnosis, Neurology, Academic Emergency Medicine, Journal of Vestibular Research and BMJ Quality & Safety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.