Das Gesundheitswesen

3.4k papers and 17.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.4k papers published in Das Gesundheitswesen in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Das Gesundheitswesen usually cover General Health Professions (2.3k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (758 papers) and Clinical Psychology (406 papers) specifically the topics of Health and Medical Studies (1.7k papers), Challenges in Elderly Care and Demographic Transition (423 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (318 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Das Gesundheitswesen are Hannelore Löwel, Falk Hoffmann, Rolf Holle, Michael Happich, Enno Swart, H.-Erich Wichmann, A. Icks, Peter Ihle, Andreas Mielck and Siegfried Geyer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Das Gesundheitswesen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Das Gesundheitswesen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Das Gesundheitswesen.

Countries where authors publish in Das Gesundheitswesen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Das Gesundheitswesen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Das Gesundheitswesen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Das Gesundheitswesen more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025