Journal of Robotic Surgery

1.9k papers and 14.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Journal of Robotic Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Robotic Surgery usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (696 papers) and Oncology (325 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (460 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (275 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (229 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Robotic Surgery are Vipul Patel, Sam B. Bhayani, Michael E. Moran, John F. Boggess, Charles Gerald T. Ledonio, Ivo A. M. J. Broeders, Sherry M. Wren, Timothy A. Plerhoples, Tina Hernandez‐Boussard and R. Sherburne Figenshau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Robotic Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Robotic Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Robotic Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Robotic Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Robotic Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Robotic Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Robotic Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025