Mining Metallurgy & Exploration

2.0k papers and 13.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration in the last decades have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration usually cover Mechanical Engineering (1.1k papers), Water Science and Technology (746 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (595 papers) specifically the topics of Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (725 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (512 papers) and Mineral Processing and Grinding (453 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration are S. Komar Kawatra, I. Iwasaki, Jan D. Miller, K. Natarajan, Brij M. Moudgil, Subhash Chander, James C. Hower, D.W. Fuerstenau, F.F. Aplan and Pradip.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration.

Countries where authors publish in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mining Metallurgy & Exploration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mining Metallurgy & Exploration more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025