Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Toxicology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Toxicology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology.
About Current Protocols in Toxicology
The 390 papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology usually cover Aging (10 papers), Biochemistry (37 papers), Pharmacology (24 papers), Molecular Biology (181 papers) and Small Animals (19 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (26 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (26 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (24 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (22 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (22 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (18 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Toxicology are Michael Aschner, Bengt Mannervik, Leslie B. Poole, Arne Holmgren, Yvonne Will, Elias S.J. Arnér, Lucio G. Costa, Kimberly Nelson, Steven D. Aust and Christopher A. Reilly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.