Current Opinion in Physiology

525 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 525 papers published in Current Opinion in Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Physiology usually cover Molecular Biology (193 papers), Physiology (98 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (88 papers) specifically the topics of Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (47 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (43 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Physiology are William A. Catterall, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Sabzali Javadov, Ashley L. Fink, Sabra L. Klein, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Andrew S. Moore, Timothy O’Leary, Fan‐Gang Zeng and Pierre Paoletti.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025