Revista de Psicodidáctica

504 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 504 papers published in Revista de Psicodidáctica in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Revista de Psicodidáctica usually cover Education (310 papers), Social Psychology (172 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (76 papers) specifically the topics of Educational Outcomes and Influences (81 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (62 papers) and Educational theories and practices (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista de Psicodidáctica are Gualberto Buela‐Casal, José Fernando García Pérez, José María Madariaga Orbea, Javier Fernández‐Río, Rosario Ortega Ruiz, Yolanda Andreu, Cristina Serrano, Xavier Oriol, Arantzazu Rodríguez‐Fernández and Gonzalo Musitu Ochoa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revista de Psicodidáctica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista de Psicodidáctica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista de Psicodidáctica.

Countries where authors publish in Revista de Psicodidáctica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista de Psicodidáctica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista de Psicodidáctica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista de Psicodidáctica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025