Territory Politics Governance

548 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 548 papers published in Territory Politics Governance in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Territory Politics Governance usually cover Political Science and International Relations (317 papers), Sociology and Political Science (277 papers) and Urban Studies (103 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Refugees, and Integration (79 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (76 papers) and Political Systems and Governance (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Territory Politics Governance are Jamie Peck, Saskia Sassen, Bob Jessop, John Agnew, Glenn C. Savage, Michael Storper, Carolyn Cartier, Ron Martin, Tom Baker and Pauline Mc̲Guirk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Territory Politics Governance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Territory Politics Governance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Territory Politics Governance.

Countries where authors publish in Territory Politics Governance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Territory Politics Governance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Territory Politics Governance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Territory Politics Governance more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025