Cardiovascular Ultrasound

850 papers and 15.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 850 papers published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound in the last decades have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (695 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (311 papers) and Surgery (209 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (384 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (276 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (185 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiovascular Ultrasound are Luna Gargani, Maurizio Galderisi, Eugenio Picano, Fausto Rigo, Sergio Mondillo, Gino Soldati, Roberto Copetti, Giovanni Volpicelli, Paweł Petkow Dimitrow and Matteo Lisi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiovascular Ultrasound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiovascular Ultrasound more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025