Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

1.2k papers and 10.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (682 papers), Surgery (578 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (338 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (298 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (202 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (146 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia are Prabhakar Mishra, Uttam Singh, Amit Keshri, Anshul Gupta, Sweta Singh, Chandra Mani Pandey, Yatin Mehta, Usha Kiran, Harish Ramakrishna and Sandeep Chauhan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025