Current Cardiology Reviews

824 papers and 15.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 824 papers published in Current Cardiology Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Cardiology Reviews usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (490 papers), Surgery (223 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (114 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (100 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (86 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Cardiology Reviews are Mohamed Elgendi, М. И. Волкова, Raymond R. Russell, Garth Graham, Adrià Arboix, Luigi X. Cubeddu, Iskra Alexandra Nola, Sonja Frančula-Zaninović, Pieter G. Postema and Arthur A.M. Wilde.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Cardiology Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Cardiology Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Cardiology Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Current Cardiology Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Cardiology Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Cardiology Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Cardiology Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025