Critical Reviews in Toxicology

990 papers and 78.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 990 papers published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 78.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (452 papers), Cancer Research (258 papers) and Molecular Biology (169 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (248 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (183 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Toxicology are Stephen Safe, Edward J. Calabrese, Masazumi Harada, James P. Kehrer, Max Costa, L. Magós, Thomas W. Clarkson, Karl Fent, Charles R. Tyler and Brenda Μ. Sanders.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025