Comparative Population Studies

250 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 250 papers published in Comparative Population Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Population Studies usually cover Demography (125 papers), Sociology and Political Science (124 papers) and General Health Professions (69 papers) specifically the topics of Family Dynamics and Relationships (61 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (43 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Population Studies are Tomáš Frejka, Nikola Sander, Marc Luy, Tomáš Sobotka, Matthijs Kalmijn, Stuart Gietel‐Basten, Michaela Kreyenfeld, Daniel Lois, Dirk Hofäcker and Marcel Erlinghagen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative Population Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Population Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Population Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Population Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Population Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Population Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Population Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025