Chinese Journal of Sociology

259 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Chinese Journal of Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Journal of Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (171 papers), Political Science and International Relations (66 papers) and Demography (59 papers) specifically the topics of China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (51 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (40 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Sociology are Yu Xie, Ping Lü, Xiaogang Wu, Wei‐Jun Jean Yeung, Li‐An Zhou, Haiyan Zhu, Shu Hu, Dudley L. Poston, Jia Yu and Yuxiao Wu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025