The Psychoanalytic Quarterly

2.0k papers and 23.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), General Psychology (329 papers) and Philosophy (235 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1.1k papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (329 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly are Jacob A. Arlow, Owen Renik, Ralph R. Greenson, Thomas H. Ogden, Jessica Benjamin, Heinrich Racker, Charles Brenner, Hans W. Loewald, Roy Schafer and Irwin Z. Hoffman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Psychoanalytic Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025