Psychoanalytic Psychology

1.9k papers and 18.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Social Psychology (335 papers) and General Psychology (209 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (818 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (209 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalytic Psychology are Philip M. Bromberg, Beatrice Beebe, Frank M. Lachmann, Donnel B. Stern, Robert D. Stolorow, Michael Franz Basch, Jonathan Shay, Stephen Mitchell, Robert F. Bornstein and Jessica Benjamin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalytic Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalytic Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalytic Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025