Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalytic Psychology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalytic Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalytic Psychology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology.
About Psychoanalytic Psychology
The 1.9k papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 20.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychology usually cover General Psychology (213 papers), Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers) and Applied Psychology (115 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (828 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (213 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (180 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (146 papers), Child Therapy and Development (132 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (113 papers), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (112 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalytic Psychology are Philip M. Bromberg, Beatrice Beebe, Frank M. Lachmann, Donnel B. Stern, Jonathan Shay, Robert D. Stolorow, Stephen Mitchell, Michael Franz Basch, Robert F. Bornstein and Jessica Benjamin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.